Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ethan S's avatar

It was definitely a tale of two halves. The question I'm left with is this: Do the fantastic substitutions make up for the first half blunders, or did they just shed more light on how atrocious the blunders were to begin with? Gregg's been quite confusing as of late. I sat not too far away from where he stood in Nashville, and although I clearly yelled at him for subs, he just had to wait until the 80th. It made no sense! I appreciate his willingness to course correct, and assess tonight's mess at halftime, but it just seems so disjointed.

The team looks like they don't have a true direction at times, and they play like they don't know where the attack should come from. There's no real pivots between the lines, and taking Adams out of the middle only made that worse. Our strikers can't hold the ball up (though Pepi did well tonight), and our movement in the final third is lacking.

Optimistic take: This will be the turning point, and this big win will finally get some momentum going our way.

Pessimistic take: The second half was just an example of a more talented side taking advantage of a lesser side that was fatigued. One goal just allowed things to open up.

We shall see!

Expand full comment
OC3's avatar

On one hand Berhalter made some great tactical changes that helped set the team up for success.

On the other hand those were largely to fix his horrible tactical mistakes with the starting line-up.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts